State Of Mato Grosso Do Sul Pantanal Commission For Justice And The Constitution Senator Constitutional Amendment

The latest and trending news from around the world.

State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Pantanal, Commission for Justice and the Constitution, Senator, Constitutional amendment
State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Pantanal, Commission for Justice and the Constitution, Senator, Constitutional amendment from

Mato Grosso do Sul Pantanal Environmental Protection Rule Faces Setback

Proposed Constitutional Amendment Fails in Commission

A proposed constitutional amendment that aimed to protect the Pantanal, the world's largest tropical wetland, has faced a setback in Brazil. The Commission for Justice and the Constitution of the Mato Grosso do Sul Legislative Assembly voted against the amendment, effectively killing the proposal.

Amendment Intended to Safeguard Pantanal's Environment

The proposed amendment sought to establish a set of environmental protection measures for the Pantanal, including the creation of a permanent conservation area and restrictions on economic activities that could harm the ecosystem. The amendment was sponsored by Senator Fábio Trad (PSD), who argued that the Pantanal was facing increasing threats from deforestation, cattle ranching, and mining.

Commission Cites Concerns Over Economic Impact

However, members of the Commission for Justice and the Constitution expressed concerns that the amendment would have a negative impact on the economy of Mato Grosso do Sul. They argued that the restrictions on economic activities would hinder the development of the region and lead to job losses.

Environmentalists Express Disappointment

Environmentalists expressed disappointment over the commission's decision. They argued that the Pantanal is a vital ecosystem that provides numerous benefits, including water purification, carbon sequestration, and habitat for a wide range of species. They called on the Mato Grosso do Sul government to find alternative ways to protect the Pantanal.

Amendment May Be Revived in the Future

Despite the setback, supporters of the amendment said they would continue to push for its passage. They expressed hope that the amendment could be revived in the future, either through a new legislative proposal or a popular referendum.